Steve Brown and Will Neptune, are cabinet markers who also teach.
They wrote Classic Proportion in Eighteenth Century Furniture Design.* It is a fascinating exploration of the use of geometry in the design of 18th c. cabinet makers. The illustrations are beautiful.
I first read the article around 2020. Unfortunately, I knew very little about 18th C. cabinetmaking. Visually, the circles overwhelmed me. I just didn't get it. I put the article aside, hoping that maybe later I would understand.
Last winter I tried again. The article references James Gibbs' Rules for Drawing the Several Parts of Architecture**, first published in 1722. a book I hadn't read. I bought a copy. It was a poor reproduction, difficult to read. Then I found a clean, legible copy online. I could enlarge the words and images to easily study them. This drawing is part of Plate XXXVII.
Gibbs wrote clear and thorough explanations.
As I learned, I remembered the tic marks and notations running up the borders of other pattern books: Wm Pain, A. Benjamin, Owen Biddle. Now those segmented lines made sense. They are units of measure, a length which determines the other lengths in a specific design, a dimension that can be set with dividers, a compass. Palladio used m for 'module', Gibbs used dia for 'diameter'. Both are names for the same thing, a dimension, a building unit.
I found that Gibbs' rules for frontispieces were used on this side of the Atlantic. ***
Here is a partial view of Pain's Frontispiece in the Ionic Order, c. 1774.***
The dimensions of the door are noted in diameters as well as in feet and inches.
Asher Benjamin's engraving of a Doric entrance, 1797, lays out the dimensions along the left side, but simply lists them along the bottom. He writes that "the height of the column is 10 parts, one of which is the diameter of the column..." He uses one diameter for the sub-plinth, two for the entablature.
Yes, Asher Benjamin's first book has poor quality prints.***
No comments:
Post a Comment