tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8118094056356737952.post1462442977646186353..comments2021-04-04T18:21:19.960-04:00Comments on Jane Griswold Radocchia: Arnold House, Westfield, Massachusetts - Part 2 Janehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03960577578174018923noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8118094056356737952.post-49731097681458416422015-12-31T18:48:28.511-05:002015-12-31T18:48:28.511-05:00You are right!
I was not careful enough. I find t...You are right! <br />I was not careful enough. I find the Golden Section is not often used, while the Root 2 rectangle is. Maybe it's easier? <br />I will change the post. <br />Thank you for the note. Thank you for reading my blog.<br />Jane Janehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03960577578174018923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8118094056356737952.post-34360890488716650782015-12-31T13:33:46.246-05:002015-12-31T13:33:46.246-05:00Please, excuse me. It appears you may have made a...Please, excuse me. It appears you may have made an error in the last steps of your analysis. <br /><br />You state "the Golden Section (a square and the length of it's diagonal) in black." <br /><br />I believe this is the geometric definition of the root ratio - the square root of 2 or approximately 1.414. Since the Golden Section is approximately 1.618, wouldn't using it have show an even larger difference than you indicate in the post? <br /><br />Thank you for taking the time to write these posts.<br /><br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00128888796733522864noreply@blogger.com